![]() ![]() Vasudevan’s approach was to conduct a historical analysis on the characteristics of successful storage vendors and quickly recognized that with the exception of a few, when these companies reached 2,000 customers – give or take- their growth really started to stall. Some 50 other start-ups entered the market during those years. ![]() Nimble Storage was not alone in this view. Vasudevan realized the opportunity for a new entrant to build not just a sizable business, but really take on even the likes of EMC and NetApp sized companies. They concluded that it was unlikely that these large companies could realistically re-architect their entire systems. “Yet, when you look at most of the companies in our industry, whether it's NetApp or EMC or Dell or HP, so much of their installed base was on existing hardware and the software architecture had evolved around the disc drives over two decades,” says Vasudevan. The group also believed that Flash was so different from disc drives, that it required rethinking the storage architecture from the ground up. The founders and I all came to the conclusion that storage was going to go through a mega change over the next 15 years, and one of the big causes of that disruption was going to be Flash,” says Vasudevan. The founding premise was also something that we were aware of at NetApp. We intersected for a while in the late '90s. “I got to know one of the founders of Nimble during my time at NetApp. The management of the storage array is very simple, and the self-installation was an added benefit.CEO Suresh Vasudevan joined founder Varun Mehta and Umesh Maheshwari on Nimble's board in 2009 and took on his current leadership role in 2011. For smaller companies, Primera might be a better option. It is also not very scalable, with a limit of 4 nodes.Īmong HPE storage services, Nimble is a better option for large enterprises or companies undergoing a full haul. You cannot tune hot/cold blocks to reduce costs. Primera does leave some room for improvement, though. Finally, because it is self-installable, you can do your own upgrades. Even if you handle high IO clients while dealing with background tasks, it doesn’t have issues. Primera offers us a stable storage environment and good performance, allowing us to save on storage through decompression and deduplication. First of all, it is more affordable than Nimble. We also found that it doesn’t have enough documentation for support if you want to add more Nimble boxes for redundancy.įor us, HPE Primera was a better choice. Also, if you need to upgrade parts for the system, the cost can get high. For us, though, it was a bit too expensive to justify the cost.Īlthough it provides easy hardware management, single-pane management can confuse a user when trying to manage multiple units. It is good for organizations that are doing a complete re-haul or refresh project. It is easy to implement and provides high performance. We used Nimble storage, and we could migrate almost all our physical hardware. The solution offers SSD-based cache devices and all SSD devices so you can have consistent fast storage or a high-level box that can serve up fast. It is easy to use and doesn’t require much training for admins. HPE Nimble is a versatile synced WAN San solution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |